mirror of
https://github.com/apple/swift-foundation.git
synced 2025-05-20 04:12:17 +08:00
* rdar://107778676 Stop vendoring the Collections package * rdar://107778676 Fix test expectation AttributedString.CharacterView needs to round all indices down to the nearest Character boundary to avoid semantic issues with its Collection conformance. This means that CharacterView slices can never start or end in between Character boundaries. * Remove a stray print statement
281 lines
15 KiB
Swift
281 lines
15 KiB
Swift
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// This source file is part of the Swift.org open source project
|
|
//
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2020-2023 Apple Inc. and the Swift project authors
|
|
// Licensed under Apache License v2.0 with Runtime Library Exception
|
|
//
|
|
// See https://swift.org/LICENSE.txt for license information
|
|
// See https://swift.org/CONTRIBUTORS.txt for the list of Swift project authors
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#if FOUNDATION_FRAMEWORK
|
|
@_implementationOnly @_spi(Unstable) import CollectionsInternal
|
|
#else
|
|
import _RopeModule
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
@available(macOS 12, iOS 15, tvOS 15, watchOS 8, *)
|
|
extension AttributedString {
|
|
@preconcurrency
|
|
public struct SingleAttributeTransformer<T: AttributedStringKey> : Sendable where T.Value : Sendable {
|
|
public var range: Range<Index>
|
|
|
|
internal var attrName = T.name
|
|
internal var attr : _AttributeValue?
|
|
|
|
public var value: T.Value? {
|
|
get { attr?.rawValue(as: T.self) }
|
|
set { attr = .wrapIfPresent(newValue, for: T.self) }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@preconcurrency
|
|
public mutating func replace<U: AttributedStringKey>(with key: U.Type, value: U.Value) where U.Value : Sendable {
|
|
attrName = key.name
|
|
attr = .init(value, for: U.self)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@preconcurrency
|
|
public mutating func replace<U: AttributedStringKey>(with keyPath: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, U>, value: U.Value) where U.Value : Sendable {
|
|
self.replace(with: U.self, value: value)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@available(macOS 12, iOS 15, tvOS 15, watchOS 8, *)
|
|
extension AttributedString {
|
|
internal func applyRemovals<K>(
|
|
withOriginal orig: AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K>,
|
|
andChanged changed: AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K>,
|
|
to attrStr: inout AttributedString,
|
|
key: K.Type
|
|
) {
|
|
if orig.range != changed.range || orig.attrName != changed.attrName {
|
|
attrStr._guts.remove(attribute: K.self, in: orig.range) // If the range changed, we need to remove from the old range first.
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
internal func applyChanges<K>(
|
|
withOriginal orig: AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K>,
|
|
andChanged changed: AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K>,
|
|
to attrStr: inout AttributedString,
|
|
key: K.Type
|
|
) {
|
|
if orig.range != changed.range || orig.attrName != changed.attrName || orig.attr != changed.attr {
|
|
if let newVal = changed.attr { // Then if there's a new value, we add it in.
|
|
// Unfortunately, we can't use the attrStr[range].set() provided by the AttributedStringProtocol, because we *don't know* the new type statically!
|
|
attrStr._guts.add(value: newVal, in: changed.range, key: changed.attrName)
|
|
} else {
|
|
attrStr._guts.remove(attribute: K.self, in: changed.range) // ???: Is this right? Does changing the range of an attribute==nil run remove it from the new range?
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@available(macOS 12, iOS 15, tvOS 15, watchOS 8, *)
|
|
extension AttributedString {
|
|
public func transformingAttributes<K>(
|
|
_ k: K.Type,
|
|
_ c: (inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K>) -> Void
|
|
) -> AttributedString {
|
|
let orig = AttributedString(_guts)
|
|
var copy = orig
|
|
copy.ensureUniqueReference() // ???: Is this best practice? We're going behind the back of the AttributedString mutation API surface, so it doesn't happen anywhere else. It's also aggressively speculative.
|
|
for (attr, range) in orig.runs[k] {
|
|
let origAttr1 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr, for: K.self))
|
|
var changedAttr1 = origAttr1
|
|
c(&changedAttr1)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr1, andChanged: changedAttr1, to: ©, key: k)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr1, andChanged: changedAttr1, to: ©, key: k)
|
|
}
|
|
return copy
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public func transformingAttributes<K1, K2>(
|
|
_ k: K1.Type,
|
|
_ k2: K2.Type,
|
|
_ c: (inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>) -> Void
|
|
) -> AttributedString {
|
|
let orig = AttributedString(_guts)
|
|
var copy = orig
|
|
copy.ensureUniqueReference() // ???: Is this best practice? We're going behind the back of the AttributedString mutation API surface, so it doesn't happen anywhere else. It's also aggressively speculative.
|
|
for (attr, attr2, range) in orig.runs[k, k2] {
|
|
let origAttr1 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr, for: K1.self))
|
|
let origAttr2 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr2, for: K2.self))
|
|
var changedAttr1 = origAttr1
|
|
var changedAttr2 = origAttr2
|
|
c(&changedAttr1, &changedAttr2)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr1, andChanged: changedAttr1, to: ©, key: k)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr2, andChanged: changedAttr2, to: ©, key: k2)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr1, andChanged: changedAttr1, to: ©, key: k)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr2, andChanged: changedAttr2, to: ©, key: k2)
|
|
}
|
|
return copy
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public func transformingAttributes<K1, K2, K3>(
|
|
_ k: K1.Type,
|
|
_ k2: K2.Type,
|
|
_ k3: K3.Type,
|
|
_ c: (inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K3>) -> Void
|
|
) -> AttributedString {
|
|
let orig = AttributedString(_guts)
|
|
var copy = orig
|
|
copy.ensureUniqueReference() // ???: Is this best practice? We're going behind the back of the AttributedString mutation API surface, so it doesn't happen anywhere else. It's also aggressively speculative.
|
|
for (attr, attr2, attr3, range) in orig.runs[k, k2, k3] {
|
|
let origAttr1 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr, for: K1.self))
|
|
let origAttr2 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr2, for: K2.self))
|
|
let origAttr3 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K3>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr3, for: K3.self))
|
|
var changedAttr1 = origAttr1
|
|
var changedAttr2 = origAttr2
|
|
var changedAttr3 = origAttr3
|
|
c(&changedAttr1, &changedAttr2, &changedAttr3)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr1, andChanged: changedAttr1, to: ©, key: k)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr2, andChanged: changedAttr2, to: ©, key: k2)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr3, andChanged: changedAttr3, to: ©, key: k3)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr1, andChanged: changedAttr1, to: ©, key: k)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr2, andChanged: changedAttr2, to: ©, key: k2)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr3, andChanged: changedAttr3, to: ©, key: k3)
|
|
}
|
|
return copy
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public func transformingAttributes<K1, K2, K3, K4>(
|
|
_ k: K1.Type,
|
|
_ k2: K2.Type,
|
|
_ k3: K3.Type,
|
|
_ k4: K4.Type,
|
|
_ c: (inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K3>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K4>) -> Void
|
|
) -> AttributedString {
|
|
let orig = AttributedString(_guts)
|
|
var copy = orig
|
|
copy.ensureUniqueReference() // ???: Is this best practice? We're going behind the back of the AttributedString mutation API surface, so it doesn't happen anywhere else. It's also aggressively speculative.
|
|
for (attr, attr2, attr3, attr4, range) in orig.runs[k, k2, k3, k4] {
|
|
let origAttr1 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr, for: K1.self))
|
|
let origAttr2 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr2, for: K2.self))
|
|
let origAttr3 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K3>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr3, for: K3.self))
|
|
let origAttr4 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K4>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr4, for: K4.self))
|
|
var changedAttr1 = origAttr1
|
|
var changedAttr2 = origAttr2
|
|
var changedAttr3 = origAttr3
|
|
var changedAttr4 = origAttr4
|
|
c(&changedAttr1, &changedAttr2, &changedAttr3, &changedAttr4)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr1, andChanged: changedAttr1, to: ©, key: k)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr2, andChanged: changedAttr2, to: ©, key: k2)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr3, andChanged: changedAttr3, to: ©, key: k3)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr4, andChanged: changedAttr4, to: ©, key: k4)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr1, andChanged: changedAttr1, to: ©, key: k)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr2, andChanged: changedAttr2, to: ©, key: k2)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr3, andChanged: changedAttr3, to: ©, key: k3)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr4, andChanged: changedAttr4, to: ©, key: k4)
|
|
}
|
|
return copy
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public func transformingAttributes<K1, K2, K3, K4, K5>(
|
|
_ k: K1.Type,
|
|
_ k2: K2.Type,
|
|
_ k3: K3.Type,
|
|
_ k4: K4.Type,
|
|
_ k5: K5.Type,
|
|
_ c: (inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K3>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K4>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K5>) -> Void
|
|
) -> AttributedString {
|
|
let orig = AttributedString(_guts)
|
|
var copy = orig
|
|
copy.ensureUniqueReference() // ???: Is this best practice? We're going behind the back of the AttributedString mutation API surface, so it doesn't happen anywhere else. It's also aggressively speculative.
|
|
for (attr, attr2, attr3, attr4, attr5, range) in orig.runs[k, k2, k3, k4, k5] {
|
|
let origAttr1 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr, for: K1.self))
|
|
let origAttr2 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr2, for: K2.self))
|
|
let origAttr3 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K3>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr3, for: K3.self))
|
|
let origAttr4 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K4>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr4, for: K4.self))
|
|
let origAttr5 = AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K5>(range: range, attr: .wrapIfPresent(attr5, for: K5.self))
|
|
var changedAttr1 = origAttr1
|
|
var changedAttr2 = origAttr2
|
|
var changedAttr3 = origAttr3
|
|
var changedAttr4 = origAttr4
|
|
var changedAttr5 = origAttr5
|
|
c(&changedAttr1, &changedAttr2, &changedAttr3, &changedAttr4, &changedAttr5)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr1, andChanged: changedAttr1, to: ©, key: k)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr2, andChanged: changedAttr2, to: ©, key: k2)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr3, andChanged: changedAttr3, to: ©, key: k3)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr4, andChanged: changedAttr4, to: ©, key: k4)
|
|
applyRemovals(withOriginal: origAttr5, andChanged: changedAttr5, to: ©, key: k5)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr1, andChanged: changedAttr1, to: ©, key: k)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr2, andChanged: changedAttr2, to: ©, key: k2)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr3, andChanged: changedAttr3, to: ©, key: k3)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr4, andChanged: changedAttr4, to: ©, key: k4)
|
|
applyChanges(withOriginal: origAttr5, andChanged: changedAttr5, to: ©, key: k5)
|
|
}
|
|
return copy
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@available(macOS 12, iOS 15, tvOS 15, watchOS 8, *)
|
|
extension AttributedString {
|
|
public func transformingAttributes<K>(
|
|
_ k: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K>,
|
|
_ c: (inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K>) -> Void
|
|
) -> AttributedString {
|
|
self.transformingAttributes(K.self, c)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public func transformingAttributes<K1, K2>(
|
|
_ k: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K1>,
|
|
_ k2: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K2>,
|
|
_ c: (inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>) -> Void
|
|
) -> AttributedString {
|
|
self.transformingAttributes(K1.self, K2.self, c)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public func transformingAttributes<K1, K2, K3>(
|
|
_ k: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K1>,
|
|
_ k2: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K2>,
|
|
_ k3: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K3>,
|
|
_ c: (inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K3>) -> Void
|
|
) -> AttributedString {
|
|
self.transformingAttributes(K1.self, K2.self, K3.self, c)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public func transformingAttributes<K1, K2, K3, K4>(
|
|
_ k: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K1>,
|
|
_ k2: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K2>,
|
|
_ k3: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K3>,
|
|
_ k4: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K4>,
|
|
_ c: (inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K3>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K4>) -> Void
|
|
) -> AttributedString {
|
|
self.transformingAttributes(K1.self, K2.self, K3.self, K4.self, c)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public func transformingAttributes<K1, K2, K3, K4, K5>(
|
|
_ k: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K1>,
|
|
_ k2: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K2>,
|
|
_ k3: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K3>,
|
|
_ k4: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K4>,
|
|
_ k5: KeyPath<AttributeDynamicLookup, K5>,
|
|
_ c: (inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K1>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K2>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K3>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K4>,
|
|
inout AttributedString.SingleAttributeTransformer<K5>) -> Void
|
|
) -> AttributedString {
|
|
self.transformingAttributes(K1.self, K2.self, K3.self, K4.self, K5.self, c)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|